Comorbidity of viral hepatitis and chronic spontaneous urticaria: A systematic review
|
01.10.2018 |
Kolkhir P.
Pereverzina N.
Olisova O.
Maurer M.
|
Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology |
|
2 |
Ссылка
© 2018 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Chronic viral infections including those by hepatitis B (CHB) virus and hepatitis C (CHC) virus have been reported to be comorbidities of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Here, we performed the first comprehensive review of the peer-reviewed literature (PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar) on the prevalence of CHB and CHC in patients with CSU and vice versa. The prevalence of CHB and CHC in CSU does not appear to be increased. Less than 5% and 2% of patients with CSU have markers of CHB and CHC, respectively, according to most of the 32 studies reviewed. Urticarial rash including CSU occurs in ≤3% of patients with CHC as reported by most of 20 studies analysed. Very few patients have been assessed for the effects of antiviral hepatitis treatment on their CSU, and two but not all reportedly showed improvement. Hepatitis B/C infections appear unlikely to be linked to CSU. We suggest that routine screening for these infections in patients with CSU is not relevant or cost-effective and should not be performed unless liver function tests are abnormal, risk factors or symptoms of viral hepatitis are present, or urticarial vasculitis is suspected.
Читать
тезис
|
Management of chronic spontaneous urticaria: A worldwide perspective
|
04.07.2018 |
Kolkhir P.
Pogorelov D.
Darlenski R.
Caminati M.
Tanno L.
Le Pham D.
Gonzalez-Estrada A.
Antolín-Amérigo D.
Dimov V.
Weller K.
Sánchez-Borges M.
Ansotegui I.
Maurer M.
|
World Allergy Organization Journal |
|
2 |
Ссылка
© 2018 The Author(s). Background: The approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) differ in various parts of the world. We sought to determine the adherence to international and national urticaria guidelines as well as the motives to deviate from the guidelines among physicians worldwide. Methods: A web-based questionnaire was created and launched via e-mail by the World Allergy Organization (WAO) to representatives of all WAO Member Societies, the members of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI) and the members of the WAO Junior Members Group (JMG), regardless of the specialty, affiliation, or nationality in March 2017. Results: We received 1140 completed surveys from participating physicians from 99 countries. Virtually all participants (96%) were aware of at least one urticaria guideline and reported that they follow a guideline. However, one in five physicians who follow a guideline (22%) reported to deviate from it. Reliance on own clinical experience is the most frequent reason for deviation from guidelines or not following them (44%). Young (< 40 years) and less experienced physicians more often follow a guideline and less often deviate than older and experienced ones. Physicians who follow a urticaria guideline showed higher rates of routinely ordering a complete blood count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, anti-thyroid antibodies, and thyroid-stimulating hormone and of performing the autologous serum skin test as compared to those who do not. Physicians who follow a urticaria guideline showed higher rates of using second generation antihistamines as their first-line treatment of CSU (p = 0.001) and more frequently observed higher efficacy of these drugs (or had more confidence that it would work, p < 0.019) as compared to those who do not follow the guidelines. Conclusions: Physicians' characteristics (e.g. age, clinical experience, and specialty) and country specifics and regional features (e.g. availability of drugs for CSU treatment) importantly influence adherence to urticaria guidelines and CSU patient care and should be addressed in more detail in future research.
Читать
тезис
|
C-reactive protein is linked to disease activity, impact, and response to treatment in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria
|
01.04.2018 |
Kolkhir P.
Altrichter S.
Hawro T.
Maurer M.
|
Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology |
|
9 |
Ссылка
© 2017 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Background: Elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), a sensitive marker of inflammation, have been consistently reported in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Here, we retrospectively analyzed data from 1253 CSU patients from 2 centers to answer the following questions: (i) What is the prevalence of elevated levels of CRP in CSU? (ii) Why do CSU patients show elevated levels of CRP? (iii) Are elevated CRP levels relevant?. Methods: Serum levels of CRP were measured by the nephelometric method. We collected information regarding various laboratory tests including ESR, CBC with differential, D-dimer, fibrinogen, C3, C4, IL-6, etc. For most patients, we also collected data on age, gender, duration of CSU, presence of angioedema, activity (UAS at the time of blood sampling and for 7 days), quality of life (CU-Q2oL and/or DLQI), comorbidities and possible causes of CSU, and autologous serum skin test (ASST) response. The efficacy of second-generation antihistamines was evaluated on the day of blood collecting. Results: One-third of CSU patients had elevated levels of CRP. Higher levels of CRP were associated with ASST positivity (P =.009) and arterial hypertension (P =.005), but not with other possible causes or comorbidities of CSU. C-reactive protein correlated with urticaria activity (P <.001), quality of life impairment (P =.026), and inflammatory and coagulation markers (P <.001). C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in nonresponders to antihistamines as compared to responders (P <.001). Conclusion: Elevated levels of CRP are common and relevant in CSU patients. The assessment of CRP levels may help to optimize the management of patients with CSU.
Читать
тезис
|
The role and relevance of mast cells in urticaria
|
01.03.2018 |
Church M.
Kolkhir P.
Metz M.
Maurer M.
|
Immunological Reviews |
|
17 |
Ссылка
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This review presents evidence that the skin mast cell, in particular the MCTC subtype, is the primary effector cell in urticaria. Mast cells are located in the upper dermis, the ideal situation for wheal formation and sensory nerve stimulation. Increased numbers of mast cells are found in both lesional and non-lesional skin in CSU and inducible urticaria. Mast cell degranulation in the area of wheals has been demonstrated repeatedly by light and electron microscopy. Histamine, PGD2 and tryptase are found in the venous blood draining wheal formation. The last 2 are specific for mast cells rather than basophils. Mast cell reactivity is increased in active urticaria by local inflammatory cytokines and neuropeptides. Mast cell cytokines and neuropeptides, particularly nerve growth factor, induce a Th2 type inflammation that is particularly obvious at the sites of whealing. In conclusion, autoimmunity, either of Type 1 viz. IgE antibodies to local autoallergens, or Type 2b, viz. IgG autoantibodies to IgE or its receptor, are considered to be the most frequent causes of CSU. In both cases, the mast cell is likely to be the axial cell in producing the wheals.
Читать
тезис
|