Impact of robotic learning curve on histopathology in rectal cancer: A pooled analysis
|
01.09.2020 |
Gachabayov M.
Kim S.H.
Jimenez-Rodriguez R.
Kuo L.J.
Cianchi F.
Tulina I.
Tsarkov P.
Bergamaschi R.
|
Surgical Oncology |
10.1016/j.suronc.2020.04.011 |
0 |
Ссылка
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd Background: A beneficial impact of robotic proctectomy on circumferential resection margin (CRM) is expected due to the robot's articulating instruments in the pelvis. There are however concerns about a negative impact on the quality of total mesorectal excision (TME) due to the lack of tactile feedback. The aim of this study was to assess whether surgeons' learning curve impacted CRM and TME quality. Methods: In a multicenter study, individual patient data of robotic proctectomy for resectable rectal cancer were pooled. Patients were stratified into two phases of surgeons’ learning curve. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to determine the transition from learning phase (LP) to plateau phase (PP), which were compared. CRM was microscopically measured in mm by pathologists. TME quality was classified by pathologists as complete, nearly complete or incomplete. T-test and Chi-squared tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Results: 235 patients underwent robotic proctectomy by five surgeons. 83 LP patients were comparable to 152 PP patients for age (p = 0.20), gender (67.5% vs. 65.1% males; p = 0.72), BMI (p = 0.82), cancer stage (p = 0.36), neoadjuvant chemoradiation (p = 0.13), distance of tumor from anal verge (5.8 ± 4.4 vs. 5.5 ± 3.3; p = 0.56). CRM did not differ (7.7 ± 11.4 mm vs. 8.4 ± 10.3 mm; p = 0.62). The rate of complete TME quality was significantly improved in PP patients as compared to LP patients (73.5% vs. 92.1%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: While learning had no impact on circumferential resection margins, the quality of TME significantly improved during surgeons’ plateau phase as compared to their learning phase.
Читать
тезис
|
Does transanal total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer improve histopathology metrics and/or complication rates? A meta-analysis
|
01.09.2019 |
Gachabayov M.
Tulina I.
Bergamaschi R.
Tsarkov P.
|
Surgical Oncology |
10.1016/j.suronc.2019.05.012 |
1 |
Ссылка
© 2019 Background: The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) improves histopathology metrics and/or complication rates when compared to robotic total mesorectal excision (R-TME) of resectable rectal cancer. Methods: MEDLINE, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were systematically searched by two independent researchers. Six observational studies totaling 1,572 patients (811 taTME; 761 R-TME) were included after screening 14 potentially eligible records. Mantel-Haenszel method using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (OR (95%CI)) and inverse variance with mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (MD (95%CI)) as an effect measure for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively, was employed for meta-analysis. Statistical heterogeneity among effect estimates was evaluated using I2 and Tau2. Results: Circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement rates (3.8% taTME; 5.3% R-TME) did not differ [OR (95%CI) = 0.86 (0.35, 2.15); p = 0.75] with low among-study heterogeneity (I2 = 21%). Complication rates (35.4% taTME; 32.3% R-TME) did not differ [OR (95%CI) = 0.92 (0.64, 1.32); p = 0.65], although with moderate among-study heterogeneity (I2 = 40%). CRM involvement [OR (95%CI) = 0.76 (0.40, 1.43); p = 0.40] and complication rates [OR (95%CI) = 0.84 (0.59, 1.21); p = 0.35] did not significantly differ in subgroup meta-analysis including mid- and low rectal cancer. Distal resection margin (mm) did not significantly differ between the interventions [MD (95%CI) = −0.41 (−1.29, 0.47); p = 0.37]. Conclusions: This meta-analysis found that taTME of rectal cancer does not improve histopathology metrics and complication rates when compared to R-TME.
Читать
тезис
|
Selective approach for splenic flexure mobilization in total mesorectal excision followed by low colorectal anastomoses
|
01.01.2018 |
Tulina I.
Zhurkovsky V.
Bredikhin M.
Tsugulya P.
Tsarkov P.
|
Khirurgiia |
|
1 |
Ссылка
AIM: To evaluate the results of selective approach for splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) after total mesorectal excision with low colorectal anastomoses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical data were obtained from the multicenter RCT database comparing ileostomy and colostomy in patients with rectal cancer who underwent total mesorectal excision from 2012 to 2017. Our clinic policy is performing paraaortic lymph node dissection with 'low' inferior mesenteric artery ligation, left colic artery preservation and use of sigmoid colon for colorectal anastomosis. SFM was used only in cases of inability to apply above-mentioned procedure (selective approach for SFM). RESULTS: SFM was performed in 15 (13%) out of 115 patients. The most frequent reasons for SFM were sigmoid colon diverticulosis, impaired blood supply or inadequate length of sigmoid colon. There were no differences in intraoperative and postoperative complications between TME without SFM and TME with SFM. CONCLUSION: Selective SFM in TME followed by advanced paraaortic lymph node dissection and left colic artery preservation is safe and may be considered as a viable option to routine SFM in rectal cancer surgery.
Читать
тезис
|