Репозиторий Университета

© 2020 Elsevier Ltd Background: A beneficial impact of robotic proctectomy on circumferential resection margin (CRM) is expected due to the robot's articulating instruments in the pelvis. There are however concerns about a negative impact on the quality of total mesorectal excision (TME) due to the lack of tactile feedback. The aim of this study was to assess whether surgeons' learning curve impacted CRM and TME quality. Methods: In a multicenter study, individual patient data of robotic proctectomy for resectable rectal cancer were pooled. Patients were stratified into two phases of surgeons’ learning curve. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to determine the transition from learning phase (LP) to plateau phase (PP), which were compared. CRM was microscopically measured in mm by pathologists. TME quality was classified by pathologists as complete, nearly complete or incomplete. T-test and Chi-squared tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Results: 235 patients underwent robotic proctectomy by five surgeons. 83 LP patients were comparable to 152 PP patients for age (p = 0.20), gender (67.5% vs. 65.1% males; p = 0.72), BMI (p = 0.82), cancer stage (p = 0.36), neoadjuvant chemoradiation (p = 0.13), distance of tumor from anal verge (5.8 ± 4.4 vs. 5.5 ± 3.3; p = 0.56). CRM did not differ (7.7 ± 11.4 mm vs. 8.4 ± 10.3 mm; p = 0.62). The rate of complete TME quality was significantly improved in PP patients as compared to LP patients (73.5% vs. 92.1%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: While learning had no impact on circumferential resection margins, the quality of TME significantly improved during surgeons’ plateau phase as compared to their learning phase.

© 2019 Background: The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) improves histopathology metrics and/or complication rates when compared to robotic total mesorectal excision (R-TME) of resectable rectal cancer. Methods: MEDLINE, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were systematically searched by two independent researchers. Six observational studies totaling 1,572 patients (811 taTME; 761 R-TME) were included after screening 14 potentially eligible records. Mantel-Haenszel method using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (OR (95%CI)) and inverse variance with mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (MD (95%CI)) as an effect measure for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively, was employed for meta-analysis. Statistical heterogeneity among effect estimates was evaluated using I2 and Tau2. Results: Circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement rates (3.8% taTME; 5.3% R-TME) did not differ [OR (95%CI) = 0.86 (0.35, 2.15); p = 0.75] with low among-study heterogeneity (I2 = 21%). Complication rates (35.4% taTME; 32.3% R-TME) did not differ [OR (95%CI) = 0.92 (0.64, 1.32); p = 0.65], although with moderate among-study heterogeneity (I2 = 40%). CRM involvement [OR (95%CI) = 0.76 (0.40, 1.43); p = 0.40] and complication rates [OR (95%CI) = 0.84 (0.59, 1.21); p = 0.35] did not significantly differ in subgroup meta-analysis including mid- and low rectal cancer. Distal resection margin (mm) did not significantly differ between the interventions [MD (95%CI) = −0.41 (−1.29, 0.47); p = 0.37]. Conclusions: This meta-analysis found that taTME of rectal cancer does not improve histopathology metrics and complication rates when compared to R-TME.