Репозиторий Университета

© 2019 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma  &  Immunology Background: Mepolizumab is an anti–IL-5 antibody approved for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma. However, the prevalence of patients with severe asthma eligible for mepolizumab remains unknown, especially among children. Objective: To determine, in a population of patients with severe asthma from a tertiary referral center, the proportion of patients with an eosinophilic phenotype who would be eligible for mepolizumab, when stratified for the age of onset of asthma, and the prevalence of phenotypic features that favor mepolizumab therapy. Methods: An extensive database of 245 adults and children referred for severe asthma was used. The prevalence of severe asthma was estimated by using the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society criteria. Patients with an eosinophilic uncontrolled phenotype qualified for mepolizumab. Results: In our cohort, 216 (88%) had severe asthma. Based on blood eosinophils of either greater than or equal to 150 cells/μL or greater than or equal to 300 cells/μL, 61%/41% had an eosinophilic phenotype, while 49%/34% were eligible for mepolizumab therapy. A greater percentage of adults (60%/47% of adults with asthma onset in adulthood [AoA] and 48%/26% adults with childhood-onset asthma [<18 years, CoA]) were eligible compared with children (33%/24%), for eosinophil counts of ≥150 and ≥300 cells/μL, respectively; P < .05. Compared with adults, children had a similar number of exacerbations while having better lung function (P < .05). Among adults, those with AoA were older, were more likely to have nasal polyps (28% vs 5%; P < .05), and had higher blood eosinophil counts (272 vs 150 cells/μL; P < .05) compared with those with CoA, with no difference in lung function noted between the 2 groups. Subjects showing greater than or equal to 500 eosinophils/μL, a strong indicator for mepolizumab therapy, had more nasal polyps, higher inhaled steroid dose, lower lung function, and AoA predominance than did those with less than 500 eosinophils/μL (P < .05). Conclusions: A smaller percentage of children with severe asthma were eligible for mepolizumab compared with their adult peers. Severe AoA has distinct phenotypic features that favor treatment with mepolizumab, including greater eosinophilia and nasal polyposis, in contrast to CoA, which appears to have fewer features of type 2 mucosal inflammation.

© 2018 Medical Education. All rights reserved. The article provides a review on prevalence, phenotypes, endotypes, and the control of severe bronchial asthma. Severe asthma is a widespread, heterogeneous disease that affects 5 - 20% of patients with bronchial asthma. Prevalence of severe asthma in Russia significantly exceeds the official statistics data, therefore it is necessary to maintain a national register of patients with severe asthma. The conventional therapy for severe asthma is not always effective due to the uncontrolled course of the disease and eosinophilic airway inflammation. The identification of asthma phenotype/endotype is reasonable to develop a personalized approach to treatment. This approach allows to achieve better control of the disease and to minimize the risk of asthma exacerbations, fixed airway obstruction and adverse effects of the pharmacological therapy. The main changes in the Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention (GINA, 2018) concerning severe asthma therapy are highlighted in this article. It is also emphasized that the use of monoclonal IL-5 and IgE-antibodies could contribute to successful treatment of patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. Currently, two immunobiological drugs have been registered in Russia, omalizumab (anti-IgE antibody) and reslizumab (anti-IL-5 antibody).

© 2018 Medical Education. All rights reserved. The aim of this study was pharmacoeconomic evaluation of treatment with reslizumab compared to omalizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma. Methods. The study was based on indirect comparison between omalizumab and reslizumab in patients with severe asthma using published data. Costs of treatment with omalizumab, reslizumab, combinations of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists (ICS/LABA), outpatient treatment, treatment of exacerbations and adverse events were also compared. Сost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis were used. Results. According to results of cost-effectiveness analysis, therapy with reslizumab dominated over therapy with omalizumab in patients with severe asthma in term of exacerbation rate requiring treatment with systemic steroids. According to results of budget impact analysis, switching of 100 patients from omalizumab to reslizumab could save RUB 51.99 million per year that corresponds to 36.6% reduction in general direct costs for treatment of severe asthma. Conclusion. The results of this study demonstrated economic advantage of reslizumab over omalizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.