Репозиторий Университета

© 2018, Media Sphera Publishing Group. All rights reserved. Objective. A pharmacoeconomic analysis of direct costs on treatment with high dose intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and plasmapheresis (PP) in children. Material and methods. Literature data on the pathogenesis of Guillain—Barre syndrome (GBS) were analyzed. The results of pharmacoeconomic analysis of direct costs on treatment of GBS using IVIG and PP are presented. Risks for complications during treatment with IVIG and PP are calculated. Results and conclusion. The pharmacoeconomic analysis demonstrates comparable costs of treatment with IVIG or PP in the Russian Federation. Nevertheless, a less number of complications, convenience in use and the good safety and tolerability profile make it more preferable to this group of patients. In a clinical case of a 7-year child described in the article, treatment with 10% IVIG — privigen in dose 2 g/kg during 5 days started in the 3rd week of disease showed a marked positive effect.

© 2018 Medical Education. All rights reserved. The aim of this study was pharmacoeconomic evaluation of treatment with reslizumab compared to omalizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma. Methods. The study was based on indirect comparison between omalizumab and reslizumab in patients with severe asthma using published data. Costs of treatment with omalizumab, reslizumab, combinations of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists (ICS/LABA), outpatient treatment, treatment of exacerbations and adverse events were also compared. Сost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis were used. Results. According to results of cost-effectiveness analysis, therapy with reslizumab dominated over therapy with omalizumab in patients with severe asthma in term of exacerbation rate requiring treatment with systemic steroids. According to results of budget impact analysis, switching of 100 patients from omalizumab to reslizumab could save RUB 51.99 million per year that corresponds to 36.6% reduction in general direct costs for treatment of severe asthma. Conclusion. The results of this study demonstrated economic advantage of reslizumab over omalizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.