Репозиторий Университета

© 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of gravity, reservoir size, and competence of the ostial valve on venous reflux in different body positions. Methods: Our study included 61 lower limbs with primary incompetence of the great saphenous vein (GSV). The diameter of the GSV and its cross-sectional area, time-averaged mean velocity (TAMEAN), and reflux time (RT) were measured with duplex ultrasound with pulsed wave Doppler. Reflux volume (RV) and reflux volume flow rate (Q) were calculated. The measurements were carried out in three body positions: horizontal, A; seated upright with stretched legs, B; and vertical, C. Distal automatic cuff compression-decompression (120 mm Hg) was used as a provocation maneuver. Results: There was 100% occurrence of reflux in the patient positions B and C. Reflux was observed in 91.8% of cases in position A. All reflux parameters (TAMEAN, RT, Q, RV) and the size of the vein were significantly different in the three studied positions. The patient's height did not influence the magnitude of change in reflux parameters. All reflux parameters increased more significantly when the position changed from A to B than from B to C (TAMEAN, +103% and +37%; GSV diameter, +33% and +5%; RV, +408% and +65%, respectively). Conclusions: Observed positional changes in reflux parameters suggest that gravitational forces are not a sole explanation for reflux flow in incompetent GSV. It is likely that the gravitational effect on venous flow is mediated by the changes in vein diameter and the total volume of the venous reservoir of the leg.

© 2018, Media Sphera Publishing Group. All rights reserved. Venous surgery prescribed to the patients receiving anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation especially with the use of warfarin is considered to constitute a serious challenge due to the increased risk of the development of venous thromboembolism and other hemorrhagic complications in case of withdrawal of the anticoagulant. A clinical case of successful perioperative management of the patient with varicose veins with the use of long-term warfarin therapy for the management of atrial fibrillation is presented. Several surgical clinics refused to treat the patient on a regular basis on the ground of impracticability of any invasive procedures because of the patient’s condition taking into consideration the involuntary intake of the anticoagulation agent and the concomitant cardiac pathology. We performed the primary clinical examination and duplex ultrasound study of the patient who was found to have varicose veins in right lower extremity (С2, 3S, Ер, Аs, p, Pr2,18, LII) with the international normalized ratio (INR) being 3,64. We confirmed the indication for the surgical treatment and offered the patient high ligation, stripping and phlebectomy. Prior to surgery, the patient was switched to a subcutaneous injection of enoxaparin. After reducing INR down to less the 2.0, we performed surgery under spinal anesthesia. The anticoagulation treatment was restarted 12 hours after the operation. No complications was documented within the first weeks after the intervention. The patient was switched back to warfarin therapy.

© 2018, Media Sphera Publishing Group. All rights reserved. This article was designed as a comparative review of the literature publications pertaining to the two opposite approaches to the surgical treatment of varicose veins of the lower extremities based on the vein-sparing and radical principles. We compare classical phlebectomy (i.e. endovenous treatment of varicose veins including thermal obliteration) and the vein-savings treatment with the use of the methods for the hemodynamic correction of venous insufficiency, such as ASVAL, CHIVA, and short stripping with special reference to its location and extent. Also covered in the article is the issue of the appropriate length of great saphenous vein stripping. The authors emphasize that it should be based on the extent of reflux rather than on the desire to avoid saphenous nerve injury. It is maintained that either partial or complete preservation of the stem of the great saphenous vein (GSV) in addition to the endovenous obliteration techniques is an efficient and safe modification of the surgical intervention. Stripping is indicated when the endovasal intervention is either impossible or undesirable because of clinical, anatomical, and/or technical limitations. Short stripping in the absence of total reflux in the great saphenous vein is a safer procedure in comparison with the total extirpation of the venous stem.