Pancreatic cancer: Statistics and treatment in the Russian Federation
|
01.12.2021 |
Zharikov Y.O.
Zemlyakova S.S.
Kiseleva Y.V.
Zharikova T.S.
Antonyan S.G.
Tupikin K.A.
Nikolenko V.N.
|
Russian Open Medical Journal |
10.15275/RUSOMJ.2020.0415 |
0 |
Ссылка
© 2020, LLC Science and Innovations. Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most fatal types of oncological disease in the world and is an extremely aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis. The objective of this review was to analyze the domestic data of the incidence of PC in the Russian Federation and to analyze the protocols that are used for the management of this group of patients in Russian clinical centers. For the analysis of the literature sources, the data in the elibrary.ru database published in the period from 2015 to 2019 were used. The methodology that was used in each study was examined in order to ensure its reliability, and these data were selected as potential sources of evidence for the preparation of national recommendations. The study results influence the level of evidence assigned to the publication. Updates to the national recommendations are conducted at least once every three years, and these updates depend on new information about the diagnosis and management of patients with PC.
Читать
тезис
|
Pancreatic cancer: Statistics and treatment in the Russian Federation
|
01.12.2021 |
Zharikov Y.O.
Zemlyakova S.S.
Kiseleva Y.V.
Zharikova T.S.
Antonyan S.G.
Tupikin K.A.
Nikolenko V.N.
|
Russian Open Medical Journal |
10.15275/RUSOMJ.2020.0415 |
0 |
Ссылка
© 2020, LLC Science and Innovations. Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most fatal types of oncological disease in the world and is an extremely aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis. The objective of this review was to analyze the domestic data of the incidence of PC in the Russian Federation and to analyze the protocols that are used for the management of this group of patients in Russian clinical centers. For the analysis of the literature sources, the data in the elibrary.ru database published in the period from 2015 to 2019 were used. The methodology that was used in each study was examined in order to ensure its reliability, and these data were selected as potential sources of evidence for the preparation of national recommendations. The study results influence the level of evidence assigned to the publication. Updates to the national recommendations are conducted at least once every three years, and these updates depend on new information about the diagnosis and management of patients with PC.
Читать
тезис
|
Phase I/II trial of pimasertib plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer
|
15.10.2018 |
Van Cutsem E.
Hidalgo M.
Canon J.
Macarulla T.
Bazin I.
Poddubskaya E.
Manojlovic N.
Radenkovic D.
Verslype C.
Raymond E.
Cubillo A.
Schueler A.
Zhao C.
Hammel P.
|
International Journal of Cancer |
|
8 |
Ссылка
© 2018 UICC The selective MEK1/2 inhibitor pimasertib has shown anti-tumour activity in a pancreatic tumour model. This phase I/II, two-part trial was conducted in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPaCa) (NCT01016483). In the phase I part, oral pimasertib was given once daily discontinuously (5 days on/2 days off treatment) or twice daily continuously (n = 53) combined with weekly gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) in 28-day cycles to identify the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of pimasertib. In the phase II part, patients were randomised to pimasertib (RP2D) or placebo plus weekly gemcitabine (n = 88) to investigate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. The RP2D was determined to be 60 mg BID. PFS and OS outcomes did not indicate any treatment benefit for pimasertib over placebo in combination with gemcitabine (median PFS 3.7 and 2.8 months, respectively, HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.58–1.42: median OS 7.3 vs. 7.6 months, respectively). KRAS status did not influence PFS or OS. The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was 91.1% and 85.7% for pimasertib/gemcitabine and placebo/gemcitabine respectively, but there was a higher incidence of ocular events with pimasertib/gemcitabine (28.9% vs. 4.8% for placebo/gemcitabine). In conclusion, no clinical benefit was observed with first-line pimasertib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with mPaCa.
Читать
тезис
|