Репозиторий Университета

© 2018, Dynasty Publishing House. All rights reserved. The objective. To improve methods of surgical management of post-caesarean uterine scar defect and to justify the choice of an operative procedure depending on the clinical situation and condition of the deficient scar. Patients and methods. We examined 44 patients aged 24 to 42 years, diagnosed with «Defect of the uterine scar after caesarean section». A comparative analysis of two methods of metroplasty – abdominal and vaginal – was performed. For diagnosing the state of the scar we used: transvaginal ultrasound imaging in the 2D, 3D and high-sensitivity power Doppler modes, magnetic resonance imaging, hysteroscopy. Results. The advantage of the vaginal method was recorded by several characteristics (duration of surgery, volume of intraoperative blood loss, restoration of physical activity within the first 24 hours). But its application required a number of important conditions, among which a history of not more than two caesarean sections. Pregnancy occurred in 24 (54.5%) patients 9–26 months after surgery and ended with caesarean deliveries at term. Conclusion. Management of isthnocele per vaginalis is the least traumatic method among all known techniques. But at the slightest risk of complications associated with damage of the urinary tract, laparotomy should be used. Each patient with post-caesarean uterine scar defect needs an individual approach.