Репозиторий Университета

© Bionika Media Ltd. Objective. To determine a drug that is predominant in terms of pharmacoeconomic analysis for the treatment of infertility in patients with an insufficient ovarian response. Material and methods. An information search for publications on the appropriate topic of this study was conducted in the PubMed, Medlink, and Cochrane Library databases. A total of 134 articles and abstracts were found. Two publications on an open prospective randomized controlled trial by Ferraretti et al. (2004) and an open randomized trial by Carone et al. (2012) were selected for further analysis. These articles are unique in the contents and design of the study. Results. It was established that there was presently a limited number of studies available on the treatment of infertility in women with a suboptimal ovarian response, which had been conducted on a large sample of patients. An economic evaluation of the effectiveness of infertility treatment was made in patients with an insufficient ovarian response on the basis of effectiveness analysis, cost analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, budget impact analysis, and sensitivity analysis. The compared alternatives were follitropin-alpha + lutropinñ alpha/ recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) + recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH), follitropin-alpha/ rFSH, and menotropin/human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG). Conclusion. The results of pharmacoeconomic analysis have shown that follitropin-alpha + lutropin-alpha dominates in terms of cost-effectiveness analysis and leads to cost savings in the treatment of infertility in patients with a suboptimal ovarian response.

© Ima-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved. Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is often characterized by a complex prognosis of neurorehabilitation, insufficient restoration of the functional status of patients, and a high risk of recurrent strokes and disability, which determines considerable health care costs. Objective: to carry out a comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis of the use of actovegin (Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Switzerland) in Russian patients with PSCI. Patients and methods. The investigation was conducted using a modeling method to determine the cost-effectiveness of competing treatment strategies: standard patient management; standard patient management and use of actovegin. Data from the ARTEMIDA clinical trial were used. Results and discussion. The use of actovegin was economically justified, which was expressed in more preferable cost-effectiveness indicators. Also, the use of actovegin in patients significantly reduced the risk of post-stroke dementia and, accordingly, the cost of treatment in future periods. Conclusion. The findings data indicate the clinical and economic feasibility of using actovegin in patients with PSCI.

© 2018 Medical Education. All rights reserved. The aim of this study was pharmacoeconomic evaluation of treatment with reslizumab compared to omalizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma. Methods. The study was based on indirect comparison between omalizumab and reslizumab in patients with severe asthma using published data. Costs of treatment with omalizumab, reslizumab, combinations of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists (ICS/LABA), outpatient treatment, treatment of exacerbations and adverse events were also compared. Сost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis were used. Results. According to results of cost-effectiveness analysis, therapy with reslizumab dominated over therapy with omalizumab in patients with severe asthma in term of exacerbation rate requiring treatment with systemic steroids. According to results of budget impact analysis, switching of 100 patients from omalizumab to reslizumab could save RUB 51.99 million per year that corresponds to 36.6% reduction in general direct costs for treatment of severe asthma. Conclusion. The results of this study demonstrated economic advantage of reslizumab over omalizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.